Sour Gapes. Candidate’s cry wolf

Various statements by marginal presidential candidates about thelikely electoral fraud are aimed to create a background for theirpost-election information campaigns and lawsuits, the leader of theYedyny Tsentr Viktor Baloha said Nov. 24. Source zik.com.ua 

Alarming declarations about the likely vote rigging directly point toorganizational weaknesses of some candidates as the law allows forreliable barriers against any electoral fraud. For instance, anypresidential candidate can send his 2 representatives to sit on localand regional electoral commissions, appoint observers to keep an eye onvoting and counting of ballots. Proxies of candidates who have wideauthority can also supervise the course of the voting.

“These representative must have absolute trust of their patron.Everything depends on the correct choice of a candidate andprofessional level of his team,” Baloha summed up.

Other effective barriers to electoral fraud are the Central ElectionCommission [whose members are appointed by major parliamentary partieson a quota principle] and numerous international observers. Mass mediaand NGOs, notably, the Committee of Voters of Ukraine, will also beeffective in helping to curb fraud.

Of great importance forestablishing the final tally are also exit polls run by respectedpolling companies.

“There are more than enough supervisory tools, as you see, and theywill all be used during the campaign. All the more so that there are 18presidential candidates, some having considerable weight. That is whyany declarations about the likely fraud are just attempts to justify adefeat of those who make them. Note that those candidates who areselling themselves as strong-willed and tough are most given to suchdeclarations. In fact, such declarations expose them as would-be losersand outsiders,” Baloha added. 

Advertisements

One Response to Sour Gapes. Candidate’s cry wolf

  1. UkrToday says:

    Viktor Baloha is right there is sufficient provisions for the scrutiny of the ballot. Any possibility of fraudulent activities should be readily detected. Those claiming that the election will be stolen are alarmists and their complaints to date have no substance or merit.Just because there are some perceived irregularities in the count does not invalidate the election. It needs to be established beyond doubt that any errors in the conduct of the would have produced a different outcome in the poll.Current public opinion polls indicate that the election is not even close and that the final choice will between Yulia Tymoshenko and Victor Yanukovych.All other candidates at this stage have no substance in their complaints. Sour gapes and disappointed in their own performance maybe. but they have themselves only to blame for that.They could have advocated a one round preferential voting system in which case minor candidates would have a greater overall influence in the outcome of the election.One round at half the cost. all votes count.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: